| The Magical Universe (2) |
| Monday, 24 August 2009 08:00 |
I once wrote an article about my experiences with bridge novices. They often dwell in, what I then called, the 'magical universe'. The article has lost none of its topicality. My students eye me in astonishment when I tell them I never count trumps - which is the truth. Active counting is unnecessary. An example: if in a 4-4 trump fit declarer draws trumps twice, all he has to do is register whether both opponents follow suit. If so, only one trump remains to be drawn. After all, the suit is divided 3-2. That is why I do not count, nor think along the following lines: 'I have played the suit twice, all followed suit, meaning eight trumps have been played; I have four left, this adds up to twelve, so there is one left to draw.' There are essential differences between these two methods. First: 'thinking in patterns' (as I call it) hardly consumes any 'thinking energy', since the brain is in automatic mode. Secondly in thinking this way students gain a clear insight in the bridge game in a natural way. They succeed more easily in overviewing the possible distributions of the missing cards. Being declarer, construct a picture in your mind of the ways the suits can be divided between the opponents. This will probably not always be relevant to your line of play, but force yourself to do it every time and for all four suits. You can also train this when you are defending. How are the suits distributed? What does partner hold? What does declarer hold? Make presumptions: 'If partner has two hearts, declarer has five.' Is that possible? Would declarer have bid differently holding five hearts? |