| A limit bid* |
|
Which South hand fits the bidding best?
1 Limit raise, not forcing but invitational
Solution South 1 should bid not 3♣ but 1♠. We never settle for a minor suit if a major suit fit cannot be ruled out. So South should bid his four-card major, no matter how feeble it is. If there turns out to be a 4-4 spade fit, a spade contract will usually be superior to a club contract since (a) it pays better and (b) game in spades is a trick less than game in clubs. South 2 is too strong for an invitational bid. He should settle for game. South 3's hand is perfect for 3♣. He denies a four-card major and bids invitationally to game. If North has extra strength he will often bid 3NT. Or he will bid three in a suit, to show a guard. This is the start of an investigation: if NS turn out to have guards in all side suits, they will end up in 3NT. If there turns out to be an unguarded suit, they continue the investigation. * To make such a 1♦ bid without having a diamond suit is — on a hand like this (!) — neither a psychic bid nor cheating. Furthermore partner is not obliged to alert this 1♦ response 'just in case South has this kind of hand'. The reason is that South will always make such a non-natural bid on a hand like this since he doesn't have a choice: there is no natural bid available (3NT is a wild gamble). EW are expected to know this, they will have encountered similar bidding problems themselves.
But if NS have not agreed upon such a convention, South is in a fix. He is (far) too strong for a raise to 4♠ and 3♠ is not forcing. 4NT, which will unfortunately be the choice of many a South player, is a very bad bid (what should South bid next, if North shows one ace...?). In short, South has no choice: he bids 2♣. North doesn't have to alert, even if he knows that South can bid 2♣ on this kind of hand. EW are supposed to know that this is a possibility. Such bids are of course very rare. But note that if South were to do such a bid while having a perfectly natural alternative, he would deviate from natural bidding. If he does so regularly, his partner has to alert! |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||