| Reading about blunders others make is great fun. On this page you find a collection of those blunders and other disasters in bridge. Enjoy them like we did, knowing very well we all are more than capable of making the same type of mistakes... |
|
|
How strong is that 1NT reply? * |
|
Wednesday, 18 August 2010 07:00 |
|
The 2001 final of the Dutch Meesterklasse ('Master League', the top league) for teams. Modalfa (Amsterdam) plays De Lombard (Rotterdam), contesting the Dutch championship. Any Amsterdam-Rotterdam encounter is characterised by intense rivalry, like Ajax - Feyenoord at football (soccer). Noteworthy is that in that year's final all of the contesting partnerships were new: none of them had been playing in the Master League for longer than a year. Perhaps that is what caused the disaster below (by the way: Muller — De Wijs, to name one of the pairs, still play as a pair today, in 2010; so maybe some things have changed.) |
|
Read on
|
|
A less successful penalty double * |
|
Tuesday, 15 June 2010 07:00 |
|
The 1989 European Championships in Turku, Finland, Great-Britain vs. Austria.
Englishman Tony Forrester (photo), then already a world class player (he still is, so he is at the top for decades now), deliberately underbid, giving the opponents all the rope they needed to hang themselves. Of course, with hindsight it is easy to say that the opponent in question should have known better. But it is the hallmark of the real crack to recognise opportunities in which he can make life miserable for his opponents. |
|
Read on
|
|
East feels she can beat 7♦... |
|
Saturday, 24 April 2010 07:00 |
|
The 1989 Women's World Championship Teams (contesting the Venice Cup) in Perth; Australia, the USA vs. the Netherlands. On the deal below, something goes seriously wrong on the Dutch side. But then an American player glitches and saves the Dutch women: | E/NS | ♠ | —
| | | | ♥ | A 7 | | ♦ | K 5 2 | | ♣ | A K Q 8 6 5 4 3 | | ♠ | 10 9 4 |  | ♠ | K 8 7 6 5 2 | | ♥ | K 9 8 6 5 4 | ♥ | J | | ♦ | 8 4 | ♦ | Q J 10 6 | | ♣ | 9 2 | ♣ | 10 7 | | | ♠ | A Q J 3 | | | ♥ | Q 10 3 2 | | ♦ | A 9 7 3 | | ♣ | J |
| West | North | East | South |
|---|
| Bethe | Bakker | Gwozdzinsky | Gielkens | | — | — | 2♠1 | 2NT | | 3♠ | 4♠2 | pass | 5♥ | | pass | 7♣3 | pass | 7♦ | | pass | pass | double! | 7NT | | double | pass | pass | pass | | pass | | | |
1 Weak two: six-card suit, 6-10 HCP 2 Meant as control-showing; interpreted by South as 'two suits' 3 Meant to play; interpreted by South as 'choose between the minors' (consistent in view of 2) |
|
Read on
|
|
|
I spy with my little eye... |
|
Thursday, 15 April 2010 07:00 |
|
Even top class players are sometimes guilty of it: reasoning from their own hand. The danger in doing so is that a player's defensive play is based on what he can see, but his partner can't. As a consequence 'the other side of the table' can go terribly wrong. Take a look at how Brad Moss and partner Fred Gitelman allow an unmakable game to be made, when Moss doesn't realise the problem his partner faces. |
|
Read on
|
|
A disaster? Certainly, but is it a blunder as well? |
|
Monday, 12 April 2010 07:00 |
|
Allowing declarer to score +680 in 4♥ while the opponents could have cashed an ace-king in two suits, looks to be a blunder. But is it? Cap Gemini Tournament, 1998, The Hague. NS are Enri Leufkens and Berry Westra, already then veterans in this prestigious tournament. As a pair their best years were '93-'96, but at this tournament they always perform well. They play against two brothers, Jason and Justin Hackett, nowadays a world famous pair, then at the start of their illustrious carrier. The English pair did very well and finished fourth, despite this disaster against Leufkens − Westra. | N/All | ♠ | 9 6 | | | | ♥ | J 2 | | ♦ | A J 10 9 7 4 2 | | ♣ | 6 3 | | ♠ | A K 10 4 3 |  | ♠ | J 8 2 | | ♥ | 10 7 5 | ♥ | Q 8 4 | | ♦ | 3 | ♦ | 8 6 5 | | ♣ | Q J 8 7 | ♣ | A K 9 4 | | | ♠ | Q 7 5 | | | ♥ | A K 9 6 3 | | ♦ | K Q | | ♣ | 10 5 2 |
| West | North | East | South |
|---|
| Jason Hackett | Leufkens | Justin Hackett | Westra | —
| 3♦ | pass | 3♥ | | pass | 4♥ | pass | pass | | pass | | | |
|
|
Read on
|
|
Unblocking necessary or not...** |
|
Friday, 26 February 2010 07:00 |
|
To become a world champion one has to play well, of course, but some luck is needed as well. Observe what happened in the Round Robin of the 1993 World Championship teams (contesting the Bermuda Bowl). Netherlands played the ever tough Indonesian team and was presented with 12 easy IMPs in the following way. | N/All | ♠ | 9 7 | | | | ♥ | Q 9 3 | | ♦ | 8 4 | | ♣ | A Q 7 6 3 2 | | ♠ | A J 10 4 2 |  | ♠ | K 5 3 | | ♥ | K J 10 | ♥ | 8 7 6 2 | | ♦ | J 5 3 | ♦ | K 7 6 | | ♣ | J 8 | ♣ | 10 5 4 | | | ♠ | Q 8 6 | | | ♥ | A 5 4 | | ♦ | A Q 10 9 2 | | ♣ | K 9 |
| West | North | East | South |
|---|
Jansen Munawar | Manoppo Leufkens
| Westerhof Sacul | Lasut Westra | | - | pass | pass | 1NT | | pass | 3NT | pass | pass | | pass | | | |
|
|
Read on
|
|
|
|
|