| Never stop counting!*** |
| Wednesday, 21 October 2009 07:00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 'tell me more about your holding in the majors' West leads the ♦4, fourth best, East's ♦Q winning (South the ♦6). East switches to the ♥8, South wins with the ♥A, West the ♥4. Solution East can reconstruct the entire deal just by counting. South showed four hearts in the bidding and turns out to have four clubs as well. Partner has led the ♦4 and has discarded the ♦2, showing a five card suit (if he had started with six diamonds, ♦xxx432, he would have discarded the ♦3 instead of the ♦2). The deal is therefore (red cards have been played):
Does East spot the danger? If he fails to cash the ♠A now but instead plays his fourth club (or a heart) directly, he creates major problems for his partner. On the fourth club West can shed a heart but then declarer cashes his remaining two hearts. What can West do? It pays to stop and think in seemingly 'standard' situations, like the one East was in after winning with the ♣J. The author (Dutch Youth International Frank Visser) was East here and 'forgot' to cash the ♠A on the moment suprème, thereby manoeuvring his internetpartner into this squeeze. The lesson is clear: never stop counting! PS: Note West encouraged when East switched to a heart. He need not (and should not) have done so: East knows West's four card suit from the bidding. West should only encourage holding an honour card. PPS: Declarer makes his contract if he plays (finesses!) spades himself directly. This way he ends up with four tricks in hearts, two in diamonds, two in clubs and one in spades. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
