| Something wrong in 'What went wrong?' |
| Friday, 29 May 2009 08:06 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Brian Richardson (read his comment below the diagram) refers to an evaluation of a bidding you can find here: These are the hands and bidding in question:
Brian's comment: In this hand the commentary suggested that East was to blame because of poor evaluation of his hand. Most teachers in the US would put more of the blame on West for poor evaluation. We would take the view that West has 18 Dummy Points and should bid 4 Hearts over East's one Heart response. Reply from Ed Hoogenkamp ('South'): Dear Brian, Thank you very much for your input. It could very well be that 4♥ is the best bid with the west hand. Opposite a poor hand with a four card heart suit and say 6-7 points 4♥ will probably not make though. The fifth heart and east's nice distribution make it a good game. Having said that, the answer would have been clearer if west had had a point less. Best regards from Barcelona. I'm sorry to have to disappoint you Ed, but as west I would bid 3♥ in any kind of match.
I would put my money on NS if east has to play 3♥, not to mention 4♥. Best regards from Orkanger. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

(favourable lead...).