| Take-out or penalty? |
|
Dear Ed & Peter, Thank you, To start with: we suppose that 'we went down badly' means: 'They made their contract with overtricks', since after the auction as Ray described it they play the doubled contract, -Ed & Peter Reply from Ed Hoogenkamp ('South'): Dear Ray, Without the exact bidding sequence it is difficult to answer this question (please send it to us) Peter reads all my take out doubles as penalty and vice versa, let's see what he has to say. Reply from Peter van der Linden ('North'): Dear Ray, I agree with Ed, without more information your question is hard to answer.
Partner's second double is 100% for take-out. So you'd better bid, unless you have a strong six (five?) card suit in clubs (hardly possible in view of West's bidding).
Partner's second double shows a strong hand and is, like almost any double of a notrump bid, for penalties. Holding 3 HCP (as you said) and a more or less balanced hand you pass and hope for the best. If you have a six card suit (or decent five card suit) you bid it.
Since EW have found a fit, partner's second double is 100% for take-out. So you should bid.
This is trickier. In principle North's first double promised three suits (diamonds, hearts and spades). However, his second double changes that message: it shows a very strong hand (although not 19-20 balanced, since he would have bid 1NT at his second turn instead of doubling again), meaning his hand does not have to meet the distributional demands of the first double anymore. So we conclude that only if the second double is of a notrump bid, it is for penalties. In all other cases the double is for take-out. En hils fra Orkanger |