Home | Bridge questions | 3NT relay?
3NT relay?

Dear Ed & Peter,

I pre-empt 3 and my partner bids 3 NT, with 21 points and two diamonds.
I passed because that was game.
However she was using the 3NT bid to ask for a feature.
What should I do in future in a similar position?

You had another question, featured in a previous email a week or so ago, offering Michael Lawrence's computer program called "Overcalls". I downloaded the demo, liked it, and want to buy it, but the order form asked for an ordercode which I couldn't access.
What should I do? I tried emailing Michael Lawrence at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it but it couldn't be sent. The price is £ 12,95 pounds which is about CAN $ 22, excluding tax and shipping. Please advise. 

Thanks for your time and energy.
Goldie Silverman

Reply Ed Hoogenkamp (South)

Dear Goldie,

First your question about the 3NT bid. This is 100% natural and thus to play. I recommend everyone NEVER to use 3NT in any situation as a conventional bid. Only top ranking pairs who check their agreements daily, can risk it (for example after a fit in a major suit is established in the bidding it's used as a 'last train' convention — Ed means Serious NT, -Peter — after a cuebid). If your partner disagrees, please let her write me a letter, we'll talk...
About your second question: I checked the site where the demo can be downloaded (http://www.bridge-software.eu/paginas/overcalls.html) and as I understand it, you can find the order code in the demo version once you have activated it. So, look around and try to find that code in the demo. Mail me if you don't find it.

Un saludo desde Barcelona 


Reply Peter van der Linden (North)
Dear Goldie,
 
I agree with Ed that your partner's 3NT bid was natural. No question about it: you were under obligation to pass! How else can you end up in 3NT if that is the right contract...?

There are very, very few occasions where 3NT is not to play. I don't know what Ed means with his 'last train' (I thought last train was the bid under four in the established major suit, to show slam interest, but not necessarily a control in the bid suit).

I know of only two 3NT bids that are not to play. And the first one only so if the convention below has been agreed upon:

WestNorthEastSouth
1/pas3NT1

1 'No Splinter': spade fit, 13-15 HCP, no shortness

I'll explain the other one with two bidding diagrams.
After a few rounds of bidding, North's 3 bid below establishes spades as trumps:

WestNorthEastSouth
pass
...
pass...
pass3pass3NT1
pass
...
  

1 'Serious NT': forcing; shows serious slam interest; if North were to bid 4 now, he would deny controls in three suits, for he is under obligation to show his controls.

The Serious NT helps North to distinguish between a very strong South hand and a less strong hand, like South shows below (again 3 establishes spades as trumps):

WestNorthEastSouth
pass
...
pass...
pass3pass41
pass
...
  

1 Control showing; mild slam try (since South doesn't bid 3NT). North may now sign-off by bidding 4, thus denying slam interest, but not necessarily denying a control in a side suit

All other 3NT bids should be to play. After all, 3NT is the king of contracts, the most frequently played contract. If ever 3NT is a possibility, one must be able to bid it.

This is such an important principle, that it is even known in Barcelona, as you may have noticed... 
 
En hils fa Orkanger
 

Top Tips

New: Barry and Harry

Starting the 5th of march 2010: bridge adventures of the twins Barry and Harry in stories/Barry and Harry 

Bridge on posters