| Adventures of a bridge professional 4: Final White House Top Circuit 2009 |
| Thursday, 10 September 2009 07:00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Barely three days after returning from Australia Bas Drijver and I play the final of the White House Top Circuit. After four preliminary rounds the top sixteen pairs (IMP-scores) have qualified for this final. Bas and I are considered favourites, which adds to the pressure. We hope we can handle that.
On arrival in Amsterdam (at the White House venue) we are told we will be playing at table 1 North-South all the time. Furthermore all our deals are shown live on the internet (BBO). This way, the organisers tell us, kibitzers can enjoy the play of the winners even more. More pressure, I am even beginning to get nervous.
1 transfer to 3♣ An instructive deal to start with. The NS-agreement to show guards after the transfer, worked very well. After 3♥ and 3♠ South knew there was no diamond guard, hence his 5♣ bid (by the way: already after 3♥ North knew about the missing diamond guard, so 3♠ presumably promised a four card suit as a proposition for a 4♠ contract in a 4-3 fit). The most important round is the one against the manager or our team (Team 'Orange'), Eric Laurant.
1 9-12 HCP After my 1NT opener bidding 6♠ turned out to be too difficult for NS. We won 6 IMPs on the deal since about half of the NS-pairs had arrived at the slam.
1 1♦, 1♥ and 1♠ all would show a five card suit; this 4-4-4-1 was therefore the exceptional case in which East couldn't but open 1♣ on a singleton My 5♣-bid was daring but Bas' 6♣... wow! Even at the table already he was applauded by the kibitzers. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
