| What is your bid?** (12) |
| Wednesday, 03 March 2010 07:00 | ||||||||||||
You open 1NT. What is your rebid over partner's response of 2♣ (Stayman), 2♦ (Jacoby-transfer), 2♥ (Jacoby-transfer), 2♠ (weak, long minor suit), 2NT (natural), 3♣ or 3♦ (both natural, slam invitational or stronger) respectively? Solution Over partner's 2♣ bid (Stayman) you bid 2♠, showing your four card suit. At the same time you deny possession of a four card suit in hearts. Over partner's 2♦ bid (Jacoby-transfer) you do what you have to do: you bid 2♥. Partner's 2♥ bid (Jacoby-transfer) makes you very happy. He shows five spades or more. In view of your super fit (nine cards at least) and maximum hand you have ample reason to 'break' the transfer: you bid 3♠. This enables partner to bid game on rather modest values. If you content yourself with an 'obedient' 2♠ bid, partner doesn't know about the fit. Holding, for instance, 7 good points or 8 points he will pass 2♠, not wanting to risk going down. With your actual hand you will probably miss game then. Over partner's 2♠ bid you rebid 3♣. Partner's conventional 2♠ bid (quite common in Europe) shows a weak hand and a long minor suit. He wishes to play either 3♣ or 3♦ ('contract improvement', compared to 1NT). Holding clubs he will pass your 3♣ bid, holding diamonds he will correct to 3♦, after which you pass. Over partner's 2NT bid (natural, so we assume NS not to play the transfer bids as explained in Aside) you bid 3NT. Partner requests you to bid 3NT holding a maximum hand and pass holding a minimum hand. You hold an absolute maximum! Partner's 3♣ or 3♦ bid (slam invitational or stronger) improves your hand (and it was a good hand already). You definitely want to be in a slam. How to show that is a matter of agreement. |